Home > Books > V-S Day by Allen Steele

V-S Day by Allen Steele

V-S Day by Allen Steele

V-S Day by Allen Steele (Ace, 2014) is an alternate history version of World War II. This time, the “what if” is potentially very interesting. Rather than go for the major change of outcome as in P K Dick’s The Man in the High Castle, this has the German leadership change their scientific priorities and shift the war effort in a singularly unexpected way. In the real world, the Manhattan Project began in 1939 and matched the German group Uranverein. Both groups aimed to exploit uranium as the basis of a weapons program. The rest as they say, is history. In another part of Germany, Peenemünde under the direction of Dornberger began a military program to develop rockets as weapons. Thanks to the work of Wernher von Braun who borrowed many patented developments produced by American physicist Robert H. Goddard, a program was authorised by Hitler in 1942 to devastate London. Except Allen Steele has Hitler authorise the development of a suborbital bomber capable of attacking New York. Needless to say, when spies bring word of this project to the Allies, Goddard is tasked with putting together a team to develop countermeasures.

So, as a paper-based exercise, we have ourselves an early space race. The German approach is to achieve escape velocity using a rocket-sled system to slingshot the rocket-powered bomber into the air, and then bounce along the atmosphere like a stone skipping across a pool of water. The Americans build a rocket-launched fighter that can match the orbital path and then intercept. From a technological point of view, the mechanism for this interception proves one of the highlights of the book. I’d been assuming the American approach would be a suicide mission, but in this alternate, the word kamikazi obviously does not cross the Pacific. US technology comes up with a most interesting solution. Anyway, a race usually means excitement and I was looking forward to a white-knuckle scientific thriller. But it never arrives. This is a book which is never more than interesting. It never catches fire because, in a sense, both sides work in a kind of vacuum and it’s not not outer space. For there to be a race or a fight, you need a choreography of attack and defence, move and countermove. In this book, the scientists and engineers are sequestered in carefully protected environments and apart from one remarkably ineffective attempt to assassinate Goddard, and the historically accurate bombing raid by the British on Peenemünde, little disturbs the calm atmosphere in which both sides work.

Allen Steele

Allen Steele

Well, that’s not quite right. Wernher von Braun is portrayed as a man struggling with his conscience. Forced to join the Nazi Party and pay lip-service to the political hierarchy, he’s troubled both when he learns Goddard is to be targeted and as he sees slave labour used to build the launch track. Other than that, his progress is relatively serene as he overseas the production of this silver bird. Both sides have the same intellectual and engineering challenge. Before they are tapped by their governments, their rockets tend to explode shortly after the engines are fired up. A few seconds of flight is all that’s been achieved. Now both teams are given a one-shot chance to build a manned craft, one as a passive bomber, the other as an active interceptor. So they are to go from abject failure to instant success because lives depend on it. In Germany that’s both the scientists’ own lives and all the slaves whose lives are, and have been, instantly disposable. In America, our heroes are defending the people of New York from an incineration attack that’s only theoretically possible. This decision to invest American treasure in a project to defend against a purely theoretical threat is never really explored. There’s a quick meeting in the White House and the green light is lit on the basis of a renegade scientist’s assertion the German threat could be real.

During the book, there’s no mention of the Japanese or other German military manoeuvres. Nothing disturbs the focus of our group on beating the von Braum challenge. You might at least have some discussion of whether the technology could be adapted to produce intercontinental ballistic missiles. What better way of delivering the atomic bomb to Tokyo or Berlin, for that matter? This is distinctly odd. We’re watching the militarisation of science without exploring how other weapons might be developed. In Germany, we’re supposed to assume the High Command would never authorise construction of a second bomber. They have the technology and the launch track. Why would they not want a back-up? It’s not credible to assume they would simply kill all the scientists who had presided over this failure and then forget about their work. Later in America, after they had won the war, they went into space for peaceful purposes. What about the Russians? In the real world, they had spies in the Manhattan Project. What happened to the Cold War after this version of World War II ended? Everything is fudged into the background with none of the political and military context to make it believable. Sadly this leaves me thinking V-S Day is seriously underwhelming.

For reviews of other books by Allen Steele, see:
Angel of Europa
Coyote Horizon
galaxy blues
Hex

A copy of this book was sent to me for review.

  1. May 15, 2014 at 12:56 am

    This is a problem that comes up in some What-Ifs? If you drop a New Idea or Big Event into a historic situation, for it to achieve the feel of realism you need to acknowledge the ripple-effect. And you’re right; early development of ICBMs (or even shorter-range rockets that could be launched from a carrier for way-way-over-the-horizon delivery) might have changed things significantly. The lack of visceral conflict aside, it’s too bad the author didn’t explore any of that.

    My current favorite what-if? What if Germany had achieved a swift victory in WWI? Talk about interesting ripples; many alt-history readers assume a more peaceful 20th Century, but one recent novel postulates a second imperial venture by Germany–the invasion of California with Mexico’s help (after all, it was a Mexican territory at one time).

    I doubt a German invasion of American is a plausible scenario. Militarily, the scenario painted looked all too plausible; even then the US was an industrial power, but it wasn’t a first-class military power by European standards. But it is true that institutions and policies have a kind of momentum. It took two crushing wars to stamp out German imperialism; if they hadn’t been checked in the first war, would they have simply taken their winnings and quit the game? I think not.

    • May 15, 2014 at 1:21 am

      For once, I wanted to like this idea. Although I think the science and the level of engineering available at that time would cause the project to fail, e.g. there’s nothing to explain how the suborbital bomber avoids burning up when it skips on the atmosphere, the fun an author could have playing around with the implications. . . Ah well. It’s my fault for having high hopes.

      World War I was always interesting because Asquith seemed to be relying on the Treaty of London, 1839, to respond to Germany’s violation of Belgium’s neutrality, but the reason for Britain becoming involved was probably a fear its security would be compromised if the German military took over control of the French side of the Channel. If Germany had avoided Belgium and attacked France in the south, it could probably have quickly annexed the bottom half of France without the British lifting a finger. As to your suggested scenario of Germany becoming involved in an American adventure, the logistics problems at that distance given the technology then available would probably have been insuperable.

      • May 15, 2014 at 1:43 am

        Agreed, although at the time the US had the same problems; until the construction of the US Interstate System, the west coast would have been as difficult to supply militarily as it would have been for the Germans to supply an invasion force through Baha. Elimination of a few key rail bridges could effectively isolate the coast for critical months.

        In fact, that is why the interstate system was built after WWII–to move troops, tanks, and material west fast in the case of a Russian invasion.

        It came down to the siege of San Fransisco, California’s only “major” city at the time. If Germany had managed to take it and the port and then dig in, geography would have made it virtually impossible to retake without costs rivaling the slaughter-house campaigns of WWI.

        As I said, the scenario is implausible–in the end it is precisely logistics that doomed the venture. The siege failed (by a whisker of course), and without the port Germany couldn’t securely anchor its logistical chain.

      • May 15, 2014 at 2:05 am

        The Russians Are Coming is one of my favorite Cold War films. It’s far more fun than the serious-intended Red Dawn where the Russians actually do invade. Thanks for the detail about the interstate system. As a return fact, the German military relied almost entirely on rail links to move its materiel around. Trains use far less fuel than driving long distances on roads which makes it surprising to see the USA building roads unless it was secretly an infrastructure plan to reduce unemployment.

      • May 15, 2014 at 2:32 am

        Remember that after WWII the US was awash with oil (the military has always kept a massive strategic reserve). In wartime, roads are harder to “take out” except at bridges, and if you have the gas you can off-road it around blockages.Convoys are also less vulnerable than loaded stock, etc.

        I do love The Russians Are Coming! Great fun.

  1. May 15, 2014 at 12:33 am
  2. May 15, 2014 at 12:35 am
  3. May 15, 2014 at 12:36 am
  4. May 15, 2014 at 12:37 am
  5. May 15, 2014 at 12:40 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: